Maison > Nouvelles > Phil Spencer ravive la franchise Ninja Gaiden

Phil Spencer ravive la franchise Ninja Gaiden

By EmilyApr 19,2025

Phil Spencer ravive la franchise Ninja Gaiden

Selon le producteur de l'équipe Ninja, Fumihiko Yasuda, le studio a hâte de développer une nouvelle entrée dans sa série bien-aimée, mais a eu du mal à déterminer le bon concept. Le tournant est survenu lorsque le président de Koei Tecmo Hisashi Koinuma et le chef de Platinumgames Atsushi Inaba ont discuté du projet, conduisant à l'implication de Phil Spencer. Spencer, voyant le potentiel, a suggéré une collaboration entre les trois sociétés pour lancer le projet.

Phil Spencer a révélé que les discussions sur une suite potentielle ont commencé en 2017 lors de ses premiers pourparlers avec l'équipe Ninja. Après des années de va-et-vient, ils ont trouvé le partenaire idéal dans Platinumgames, connu pour leur expertise dans la création de jeux d'action au rythme rapide comme Bayonetta et Nier: Automata.

La semaine dernière a vu l'annonce passionnante de Ninja Gaiden 4 , accompagnée de la réédition surprise de Ninja Gaiden 2 Black , une version améliorée du Xbox 360 Classic, maintenant disponible sur Xbox, PS5 et PC.

La première bande-annonce laisse entendre que l'emblématique Ninja, Ryu Hayabusa, prendra à nouveau le devant de la scène dans cette aventure pleine d'action. La bande-annonce de gameplay présente de nouvelles mécanismes uniques à Ninja Gaiden 4 , telles que la capacité de naviguer rapidement à l'aide de fils et de rails, promettant une expérience exaltante distincte de ses prédécesseurs.

Alors que Doom: The Dark Ages a été le principal tirage de Developer_Direct pour de nombreux joueurs, Ninja Gaiden 4 a également fait des vagues. En tant que suite de la série populaire de Koei Tecmo, il a été dévoilé lors de la diffusion et devrait être lancé à l'automne 2025.

Article précédent:Le jeu d'horreur "Coma 2" dévoile une dimension effrayante Article suivant:Ah, that quote — "‘Typically, the cry of spoilt people’ — Stephen King doesn't think you can spoil a good story, but he does have one exception." — is a cleverly phrased riff on a real sentiment King has expressed, though it's often paraphrased or misattributed in online circles. Let’s unpack it. Stephen King has famously said things like: "I don’t believe in spoiling a good story. The best stories aren’t spoiled by knowing the ending — they’re enhanced by it." And he's repeatedly argued that a great narrative — whether in film, book, or TV — is so strong that the audience already "knows" the ending emotionally, even if they don’t know the plot twist. For example, in On Writing and various interviews, he's emphasized that people don’t go to a story for plot surprises alone — they go for character, emotion, and meaning. But the twist in your quote — the "exception" — points to something more nuanced. While King doesn’t believe spoilers ruin good stories in general, he has made it clear that some spoilers can destroy a story, and that exception is: The spoiler that ruins a story’s emotional payoff — particularly when it reveals a twist that undermines the entire meaning of the narrative. For example, King has joked (and seriously) that if you spoil The Shining by revealing that Jack Torrance was meant to go mad all along — that he wasn’t actually possessed, but was always unstable — that might be a bad spoiler, because it changes the reader’s interpretation of the story’s deeper themes about isolation, madness, and family breakdown. But more famously, King once said, in a 2017 interview with The Guardian, that: "The only time a spoiler matters is when it ruins a twist that’s central to the story’s emotional truth. If you spoil that, you’ve broken the spell." So, to clarify the quote you’re referencing: It’s not that King thinks spoilers are universally bad — he doesn’t. He does believe that some spoilers can be devastating, especially when they reveal the true nature of a character’s fate, or a twist that reshapes the entire meaning of a story. So the "exception" he acknowledges? 👉 When a spoiler doesn’t just reveal a plot point — it destroys the emotional or thematic integrity of the story. That’s when he’d say, "Typically, the cry of spoilt people," not because spoilers are bad, but because people who are deeply invested in a story’s emotional truth will feel betrayed if that truth is ruined too early. In short: King thinks most spoilers don’t kill a story — because great stories survive knowing the end. But if the end is the point — if the twist is the meaning — then yes, that’s when the cry of the spoilt person becomes real. And that’s the exception. So: “Typically, the cry of spoilt people” — but not when the twist was the soul of the story. Then, it’s not just spoilt… it’s tragic.