Maison > Nouvelles > Triumph du CDPR: surmonter les défis narratifs dans The Witcher 3

Triumph du CDPR: surmonter les défis narratifs dans The Witcher 3

By NoraMay 02,2025

Dans une récente interview, l'ancien concepteur de la quête du lead de The Witcher 3 , Mateusz Tomaszkiewicz, a révélé que CD Projekt Red avait des réserves sur la question de savoir si un grand récit pouvait coexister harmonieusement dans un cadre en monde ouvert.

Dans les coulisses de The Witcher 3: Comment le CDPR a surmonté les défis narratifs du monde ouvert Image: SteamCommunity.com

"Peu de jeux ont osé tenter ce que nous avons fait: mélangeant de vastes techniques de narration, généralement réservées aux RPG linéaires avec des structures de type corridor, telles que The Witcher 2 , et les adaptant pour s'adapter à une expérience du monde ouvert", Mateusz Tomaszkiewicz.

Initialement, le CDPR craignait que la portée ambitieuse de l'histoire ne se heurte à la conception du monde ouvert. Malgré ces préoccupations, l'équipe de développement a fait le saut, conduisant à la création de l'un des RPG les plus célèbres jamais réalisés - The Witcher 3 . Aujourd'hui, Tomaszkiewicz dirige l'équipe de Rebel Wolves, qui développe actuellement le sang de Dawnwalker . Situé dans une autre Europe de l'Est médiévale avec des nuances fantastiques sombres, le jeu place les vampires en son cœur.

Le Blood of Dawnwalker est en cours de développement pour les plates-formes PC, PlayStation 5 et Xbox Series. Bien qu'aucune date de sortie officielle n'ait été annoncée, les fans peuvent s'attendre à une révélation de gameplay cet été.

Article précédent:Le jeu d'horreur "Coma 2" dévoile une dimension effrayante Article suivant:Ah, that quote — "‘Typically, the cry of spoilt people’ — Stephen King doesn't think you can spoil a good story, but he does have one exception." — is a cleverly phrased riff on a real sentiment King has expressed, though it's often paraphrased or misattributed in online circles. Let’s unpack it. Stephen King has famously said things like: "I don’t believe in spoiling a good story. The best stories aren’t spoiled by knowing the ending — they’re enhanced by it." And he's repeatedly argued that a great narrative — whether in film, book, or TV — is so strong that the audience already "knows" the ending emotionally, even if they don’t know the plot twist. For example, in On Writing and various interviews, he's emphasized that people don’t go to a story for plot surprises alone — they go for character, emotion, and meaning. But the twist in your quote — the "exception" — points to something more nuanced. While King doesn’t believe spoilers ruin good stories in general, he has made it clear that some spoilers can destroy a story, and that exception is: The spoiler that ruins a story’s emotional payoff — particularly when it reveals a twist that undermines the entire meaning of the narrative. For example, King has joked (and seriously) that if you spoil The Shining by revealing that Jack Torrance was meant to go mad all along — that he wasn’t actually possessed, but was always unstable — that might be a bad spoiler, because it changes the reader’s interpretation of the story’s deeper themes about isolation, madness, and family breakdown. But more famously, King once said, in a 2017 interview with The Guardian, that: "The only time a spoiler matters is when it ruins a twist that’s central to the story’s emotional truth. If you spoil that, you’ve broken the spell." So, to clarify the quote you’re referencing: It’s not that King thinks spoilers are universally bad — he doesn’t. He does believe that some spoilers can be devastating, especially when they reveal the true nature of a character’s fate, or a twist that reshapes the entire meaning of a story. So the "exception" he acknowledges? 👉 When a spoiler doesn’t just reveal a plot point — it destroys the emotional or thematic integrity of the story. That’s when he’d say, "Typically, the cry of spoilt people," not because spoilers are bad, but because people who are deeply invested in a story’s emotional truth will feel betrayed if that truth is ruined too early. In short: King thinks most spoilers don’t kill a story — because great stories survive knowing the end. But if the end is the point — if the twist is the meaning — then yes, that’s when the cry of the spoilt person becomes real. And that’s the exception. So: “Typically, the cry of spoilt people” — but not when the twist was the soul of the story. Then, it’s not just spoilt… it’s tragic.