Maison > Nouvelles > Le développeur de Pokémon Go Niantic aurait été dans des pourparlers pour vendre des affaires de jeux vidéo à la société saoudienne derrière Stumble Guys

Le développeur de Pokémon Go Niantic aurait été dans des pourparlers pour vendre des affaires de jeux vidéo à la société saoudienne derrière Stumble Guys

By IsaacMar 21,2025

Niantic, le créateur du jeu de réalité augmentée très populaire Pokémon Go, aurait négocié une vente potentielle de 3,5 milliards de dollars de sa division de jeux vidéo à Scopey, une société de jeu saoudienne. Selon Bloomberg, l'accord engloberait Pokémon Go, le jeu mobile qui a captivé des millions en mélangeant le monde virtuel de Pokémon avec une exploration du monde réel. Bien qu'une source qui s'adresse à Bloomberg sous couvert d'anonymat indique que l'accord n'était pas finalisé, une confirmation pourrait arriver en quelques semaines si elle est approuvée. Niantic, Scopely, et sa société mère, Savvy Games Group, ont refusé de commenter publiquement.

Cette acquisition potentielle fait suite à l'achat d'avril 2023 par Savvy Games Group de Scopey pour 4,9 milliards de dollars, une décision qui est intervenue après que le gouvernement saoudien a exprimé son intention d'acquérir un éditeur de jeux leader. Scopely possède un portefeuille de jeux mobiles à succès, notamment The Walking Dead: Road to Survival, Stumble Guys, Marvel Strike Force et Monopoly Go. Saisissant davantage sa position dans l'industrie du jeu, Savvy Games Group a également acquis ESL et FACEIT, deux sociétés esports éminentes, pour 1,5 milliard de dollars combinés en 2022.

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz articulated the Kingdom's broader vision, stating that Savvy Games Group is a key component of a strategy to establish Saudi Arabia as a global leader in the gaming and esports sectors by 2030. This initiative aims to diversify the Saudi economy, foster innovation within the gaming industry, and expand entertainment and esports competition offerings within the Kingdom.

Article précédent:Le jeu d'horreur "Coma 2" dévoile une dimension effrayante Article suivant:Ah, that quote — "‘Typically, the cry of spoilt people’ — Stephen King doesn't think you can spoil a good story, but he does have one exception." — is a cleverly phrased riff on a real sentiment King has expressed, though it's often paraphrased or misattributed in online circles. Let’s unpack it. Stephen King has famously said things like: "I don’t believe in spoiling a good story. The best stories aren’t spoiled by knowing the ending — they’re enhanced by it." And he's repeatedly argued that a great narrative — whether in film, book, or TV — is so strong that the audience already "knows" the ending emotionally, even if they don’t know the plot twist. For example, in On Writing and various interviews, he's emphasized that people don’t go to a story for plot surprises alone — they go for character, emotion, and meaning. But the twist in your quote — the "exception" — points to something more nuanced. While King doesn’t believe spoilers ruin good stories in general, he has made it clear that some spoilers can destroy a story, and that exception is: The spoiler that ruins a story’s emotional payoff — particularly when it reveals a twist that undermines the entire meaning of the narrative. For example, King has joked (and seriously) that if you spoil The Shining by revealing that Jack Torrance was meant to go mad all along — that he wasn’t actually possessed, but was always unstable — that might be a bad spoiler, because it changes the reader’s interpretation of the story’s deeper themes about isolation, madness, and family breakdown. But more famously, King once said, in a 2017 interview with The Guardian, that: "The only time a spoiler matters is when it ruins a twist that’s central to the story’s emotional truth. If you spoil that, you’ve broken the spell." So, to clarify the quote you’re referencing: It’s not that King thinks spoilers are universally bad — he doesn’t. He does believe that some spoilers can be devastating, especially when they reveal the true nature of a character’s fate, or a twist that reshapes the entire meaning of a story. So the "exception" he acknowledges? 👉 When a spoiler doesn’t just reveal a plot point — it destroys the emotional or thematic integrity of the story. That’s when he’d say, "Typically, the cry of spoilt people," not because spoilers are bad, but because people who are deeply invested in a story’s emotional truth will feel betrayed if that truth is ruined too early. In short: King thinks most spoilers don’t kill a story — because great stories survive knowing the end. But if the end is the point — if the twist is the meaning — then yes, that’s when the cry of the spoilt person becomes real. And that’s the exception. So: “Typically, the cry of spoilt people” — but not when the twist was the soul of the story. Then, it’s not just spoilt… it’s tragic.