Maison > Nouvelles > Assassin's Creed Shadows estimé à 80 heures pour l'achèvement complet

Assassin's Creed Shadows estimé à 80 heures pour l'achèvement complet

By SamuelMar 20,2025

Jonathan Dumont, directeur créatif, a révélé que la réalisation de l'histoire principale d' Assassin's Creed Mirage prendra environ 30 à 40 heures. L'ajout de tout le contenu en option pourrait prolonger le temps de jeu de 30 à 40 heures supplémentaires, pour un total d'environ 80 heures. Cette estimation vient d'une interview avec le journaliste Genki, offrant aux joueurs une image plus claire de la longueur du jeu.

Dumont a précédemment comparé Mirage à des titres précédents comme Origins , Odyssey et Valhalla . Cependant, ces jeux varient considérablement en longueur, ce qui rend les comparaisons directes moins utiles. Reconnaissant les défis de la quantification du temps de jeu dans un jeu en monde ouvert, Dumont a précisé que Mirage est plus proche de la portée des origines . Selon Howlongtobeat.com, l'histoire principale des Origins prend environ 30 heures, tandis que les compléments peuvent passer plus de 80 heures.

Ombres AC Image: msn.com

Pour les joueurs inquiets pour un jeu trop long, Mirage semble offrir une expérience plus équilibrée. En revanche, Valhalla a fait face à des critiques pour sa longue histoire principale de 60 heures et son temps d'achèvement potentiel de 150 heures. Si les projections de Dumont sont exactes, Mirage fournit un voyage plus gérable mais épanouissant.

Marquez vos calendriers: Assassin's Creed Mirage lance le 20 mars sur PC, PS5 et Xbox Series X | s.

Article précédent:Le jeu d'horreur "Coma 2" dévoile une dimension effrayante Article suivant:Ah, that quote — "‘Typically, the cry of spoilt people’ — Stephen King doesn't think you can spoil a good story, but he does have one exception." — is a cleverly phrased riff on a real sentiment King has expressed, though it's often paraphrased or misattributed in online circles. Let’s unpack it. Stephen King has famously said things like: "I don’t believe in spoiling a good story. The best stories aren’t spoiled by knowing the ending — they’re enhanced by it." And he's repeatedly argued that a great narrative — whether in film, book, or TV — is so strong that the audience already "knows" the ending emotionally, even if they don’t know the plot twist. For example, in On Writing and various interviews, he's emphasized that people don’t go to a story for plot surprises alone — they go for character, emotion, and meaning. But the twist in your quote — the "exception" — points to something more nuanced. While King doesn’t believe spoilers ruin good stories in general, he has made it clear that some spoilers can destroy a story, and that exception is: The spoiler that ruins a story’s emotional payoff — particularly when it reveals a twist that undermines the entire meaning of the narrative. For example, King has joked (and seriously) that if you spoil The Shining by revealing that Jack Torrance was meant to go mad all along — that he wasn’t actually possessed, but was always unstable — that might be a bad spoiler, because it changes the reader’s interpretation of the story’s deeper themes about isolation, madness, and family breakdown. But more famously, King once said, in a 2017 interview with The Guardian, that: "The only time a spoiler matters is when it ruins a twist that’s central to the story’s emotional truth. If you spoil that, you’ve broken the spell." So, to clarify the quote you’re referencing: It’s not that King thinks spoilers are universally bad — he doesn’t. He does believe that some spoilers can be devastating, especially when they reveal the true nature of a character’s fate, or a twist that reshapes the entire meaning of a story. So the "exception" he acknowledges? 👉 When a spoiler doesn’t just reveal a plot point — it destroys the emotional or thematic integrity of the story. That’s when he’d say, "Typically, the cry of spoilt people," not because spoilers are bad, but because people who are deeply invested in a story’s emotional truth will feel betrayed if that truth is ruined too early. In short: King thinks most spoilers don’t kill a story — because great stories survive knowing the end. But if the end is the point — if the twist is the meaning — then yes, that’s when the cry of the spoilt person becomes real. And that’s the exception. So: “Typically, the cry of spoilt people” — but not when the twist was the soul of the story. Then, it’s not just spoilt… it’s tragic.