Maison > Nouvelles > "Hyrule Warriors: Age of Emprisonment révélé pour Nintendo Switch 2"

"Hyrule Warriors: Age of Emprisonment révélé pour Nintendo Switch 2"

By LeoApr 17,2025

Aucune console Nintendo n'est complète sans un jeu Zelda, et le Nintendo Switch 2 emboîte le pas, mais avec une tournure inattendue. Au cours de Nintendo Direct d'aujourd'hui, nous avons découvert que Koei Tecmo développe un nouvel ajout à la série Hyrule Warriors: A Prequel to Tears of the Kingdom intitulé Hyrule Warriors: Age of Emprisonment. Les fans peuvent s'attendre à sa sortie cet hiver.

Jouer

Hyrule Warriors: L'âge de l'emprisonnement plonge dans le monde de la franchise Hyrule Warriors une fois de plus, cette fois en se concentrant sur les personnages des sections d'histoire ancienne des larmes du royaume. Attendez-vous à voir Zelda faire équipe avec le dernier Zonai restant, Rauru, sa sœur Mineru et sa femme Sonia, alors qu'ils combattent Ganondorf et ses forces. Le jeu met en lumière les activités de Zelda lors de son voyage dans le temps dans les larmes du royaume, offrant une nouvelle perspective narrative.

Nintendo Direct: Nintendo Switch 2 - Hyrule Warriors Age of Emprisonment

4 images

La bande-annonce a présenté les capacités uniques de ces champions, notamment Mineru pilotant un mécanisme, la magie enchanteresse de Zelda, Rauru brandissant une lance d'épée distinctive et de brefs aperçus d'autres gêneurs de pierres secrètes en action.

Cela marque la troisième entrée de la série Hyrule Warriors, après les Hyrule Warriors et Hyrule Warriors: Age of Calamity, qui a servi de préquelle à la légende de Zelda: Breath of the Wild. L'âge de la calamité était particulièrement remarquable pour sa narration créative qui s'est légèrement déviée du chemin attendu, ce qui lui a valu une note 9/10 de nous. Nous l'avons salué comme "une joie de jouer et de découvrir" et "une explosion du début à la fin".

Restez à jour avec toutes les annonces de Nintendo Direct d'aujourd'hui ici.

Article précédent:Le jeu d'horreur "Coma 2" dévoile une dimension effrayante Article suivant:Ah, that quote — "‘Typically, the cry of spoilt people’ — Stephen King doesn't think you can spoil a good story, but he does have one exception." — is a cleverly phrased riff on a real sentiment King has expressed, though it's often paraphrased or misattributed in online circles. Let’s unpack it. Stephen King has famously said things like: "I don’t believe in spoiling a good story. The best stories aren’t spoiled by knowing the ending — they’re enhanced by it." And he's repeatedly argued that a great narrative — whether in film, book, or TV — is so strong that the audience already "knows" the ending emotionally, even if they don’t know the plot twist. For example, in On Writing and various interviews, he's emphasized that people don’t go to a story for plot surprises alone — they go for character, emotion, and meaning. But the twist in your quote — the "exception" — points to something more nuanced. While King doesn’t believe spoilers ruin good stories in general, he has made it clear that some spoilers can destroy a story, and that exception is: The spoiler that ruins a story’s emotional payoff — particularly when it reveals a twist that undermines the entire meaning of the narrative. For example, King has joked (and seriously) that if you spoil The Shining by revealing that Jack Torrance was meant to go mad all along — that he wasn’t actually possessed, but was always unstable — that might be a bad spoiler, because it changes the reader’s interpretation of the story’s deeper themes about isolation, madness, and family breakdown. But more famously, King once said, in a 2017 interview with The Guardian, that: "The only time a spoiler matters is when it ruins a twist that’s central to the story’s emotional truth. If you spoil that, you’ve broken the spell." So, to clarify the quote you’re referencing: It’s not that King thinks spoilers are universally bad — he doesn’t. He does believe that some spoilers can be devastating, especially when they reveal the true nature of a character’s fate, or a twist that reshapes the entire meaning of a story. So the "exception" he acknowledges? 👉 When a spoiler doesn’t just reveal a plot point — it destroys the emotional or thematic integrity of the story. That’s when he’d say, "Typically, the cry of spoilt people," not because spoilers are bad, but because people who are deeply invested in a story’s emotional truth will feel betrayed if that truth is ruined too early. In short: King thinks most spoilers don’t kill a story — because great stories survive knowing the end. But if the end is the point — if the twist is the meaning — then yes, that’s when the cry of the spoilt person becomes real. And that’s the exception. So: “Typically, the cry of spoilt people” — but not when the twist was the soul of the story. Then, it’s not just spoilt… it’s tragic.