Maison > Nouvelles > Plans de Gearbox pour Borderlands 4: Aucun monde ouvert révélé

Plans de Gearbox pour Borderlands 4: Aucun monde ouvert révélé

By ScarlettApr 05,2025

Plans de Gearbox pour Borderlands 4: Aucun monde ouvert révélé

Les fans de la série de tir Looter bien-aimée attendent avec impatience le quatrième épisode de la franchise Borderlands. La bande-annonce initiale a présenté de nombreuses avancées, notamment des possibilités de plus grande échelle et d'exploration. Cependant, il est important de noter que Borderlands 4 n'est pas un jeu entièrement ouvert.

Le co-fondateur de Gearbox Software, Randy Pitchford, a explicitement déclaré qu'il ne qualifierait pas Borderlands 4 en tant que «monde ouvert». Il a mentionné que le terme transportait des connotations qui ne s'alignent pas sur la conception du jeu. Alors que Pitchford n'a pas détaillé en quoi Borderlands 4 diffère des jeux traditionnels en monde ouvert, il a souligné une distinction claire entre les segments de jeu guidés et les moments d'exploration sans restriction.

Malgré cela, Borderlands 4 est sur le point d'être l'entrée la plus ambitieuse de la série à ce jour. Les joueurs profiteront d'un mouvement transparent dans toutes les zones accessibles sans chargement d'écrans, améliorant la fluidité de l'expérience. Les développeurs se sont concentrés sur le rendement de chaque aspect de l'aventure plus structuré et engageant, visant à empêcher l'errance sans but dans le vaste univers.

Bien qu'une date de sortie exacte n'ait pas été divulguée, le jeu est prévu pour un lancement en 2025. Borderlands 4 sera disponible sur PC, PlayStation 5 et Xbox Series X / S, promettant de livrer un nouveau chapitre passionnant de l'histoire de la franchise.

Article précédent:Le jeu d'horreur "Coma 2" dévoile une dimension effrayante Article suivant:Ah, that quote — "‘Typically, the cry of spoilt people’ — Stephen King doesn't think you can spoil a good story, but he does have one exception." — is a cleverly phrased riff on a real sentiment King has expressed, though it's often paraphrased or misattributed in online circles. Let’s unpack it. Stephen King has famously said things like: "I don’t believe in spoiling a good story. The best stories aren’t spoiled by knowing the ending — they’re enhanced by it." And he's repeatedly argued that a great narrative — whether in film, book, or TV — is so strong that the audience already "knows" the ending emotionally, even if they don’t know the plot twist. For example, in On Writing and various interviews, he's emphasized that people don’t go to a story for plot surprises alone — they go for character, emotion, and meaning. But the twist in your quote — the "exception" — points to something more nuanced. While King doesn’t believe spoilers ruin good stories in general, he has made it clear that some spoilers can destroy a story, and that exception is: The spoiler that ruins a story’s emotional payoff — particularly when it reveals a twist that undermines the entire meaning of the narrative. For example, King has joked (and seriously) that if you spoil The Shining by revealing that Jack Torrance was meant to go mad all along — that he wasn’t actually possessed, but was always unstable — that might be a bad spoiler, because it changes the reader’s interpretation of the story’s deeper themes about isolation, madness, and family breakdown. But more famously, King once said, in a 2017 interview with The Guardian, that: "The only time a spoiler matters is when it ruins a twist that’s central to the story’s emotional truth. If you spoil that, you’ve broken the spell." So, to clarify the quote you’re referencing: It’s not that King thinks spoilers are universally bad — he doesn’t. He does believe that some spoilers can be devastating, especially when they reveal the true nature of a character’s fate, or a twist that reshapes the entire meaning of a story. So the "exception" he acknowledges? 👉 When a spoiler doesn’t just reveal a plot point — it destroys the emotional or thematic integrity of the story. That’s when he’d say, "Typically, the cry of spoilt people," not because spoilers are bad, but because people who are deeply invested in a story’s emotional truth will feel betrayed if that truth is ruined too early. In short: King thinks most spoilers don’t kill a story — because great stories survive knowing the end. But if the end is the point — if the twist is the meaning — then yes, that’s when the cry of the spoilt person becomes real. And that’s the exception. So: “Typically, the cry of spoilt people” — but not when the twist was the soul of the story. Then, it’s not just spoilt… it’s tragic.