Maison > Nouvelles > Un nouveau jeu dans la série Evil Genius a annoncé

Un nouveau jeu dans la série Evil Genius a annoncé

By HazelApr 09,2025

Un nouveau jeu dans la série Evil Genius a annoncé

Jason Kingsley, le PDG de Rebellion, a exprimé une affection pour la franchise Evil Genius mais reste non comité quant au développement du mauvais génie 3. Bien qu'aucune annonce officielle n'ait été faite, Kingsley détient une profonde affection pour la série et envisage activement des moyens innovants de l'élever à de nouvelles hauteurs.

Il suggère que le thème de la domination mondiale, central du génie maléfique, pourrait être exploré au-delà du genre traditionnel de simulateur de construction de base, s'aventurant dans d'autres formats de jeu stratégiques. Bien que des projets concrets soient toujours en discussion, l'équipe créative de Rebellion bourdonne d'idées nouvelles pour l'avenir de cette franchise bien-aimée.

Evil Genius 2, qui a frappé le marché en 2021, a recueilli des critiques "principalement positives" des critiques sur Metacritic. Cependant, la réception parmi les joueurs réguliers était moins enthousiaste. Malgré des améliorations des graphiques et des efforts pour corriger les lacunes précédentes, beaucoup ont estimé que la suite ne s'était pas contente de l'original. Les joueurs ont exprimé des préoccupations concernant la carte mondiale, la baisse de la qualité des sédiateurs et de l'intégrité de la structure, ainsi que de nombreux autres problèmes qui ont nui à leur expérience globale.

Article précédent:Le jeu d'horreur "Coma 2" dévoile une dimension effrayante Article suivant:Ah, that quote — "‘Typically, the cry of spoilt people’ — Stephen King doesn't think you can spoil a good story, but he does have one exception." — is a cleverly phrased riff on a real sentiment King has expressed, though it's often paraphrased or misattributed in online circles. Let’s unpack it. Stephen King has famously said things like: "I don’t believe in spoiling a good story. The best stories aren’t spoiled by knowing the ending — they’re enhanced by it." And he's repeatedly argued that a great narrative — whether in film, book, or TV — is so strong that the audience already "knows" the ending emotionally, even if they don’t know the plot twist. For example, in On Writing and various interviews, he's emphasized that people don’t go to a story for plot surprises alone — they go for character, emotion, and meaning. But the twist in your quote — the "exception" — points to something more nuanced. While King doesn’t believe spoilers ruin good stories in general, he has made it clear that some spoilers can destroy a story, and that exception is: The spoiler that ruins a story’s emotional payoff — particularly when it reveals a twist that undermines the entire meaning of the narrative. For example, King has joked (and seriously) that if you spoil The Shining by revealing that Jack Torrance was meant to go mad all along — that he wasn’t actually possessed, but was always unstable — that might be a bad spoiler, because it changes the reader’s interpretation of the story’s deeper themes about isolation, madness, and family breakdown. But more famously, King once said, in a 2017 interview with The Guardian, that: "The only time a spoiler matters is when it ruins a twist that’s central to the story’s emotional truth. If you spoil that, you’ve broken the spell." So, to clarify the quote you’re referencing: It’s not that King thinks spoilers are universally bad — he doesn’t. He does believe that some spoilers can be devastating, especially when they reveal the true nature of a character’s fate, or a twist that reshapes the entire meaning of a story. So the "exception" he acknowledges? 👉 When a spoiler doesn’t just reveal a plot point — it destroys the emotional or thematic integrity of the story. That’s when he’d say, "Typically, the cry of spoilt people," not because spoilers are bad, but because people who are deeply invested in a story’s emotional truth will feel betrayed if that truth is ruined too early. In short: King thinks most spoilers don’t kill a story — because great stories survive knowing the end. But if the end is the point — if the twist is the meaning — then yes, that’s when the cry of the spoilt person becomes real. And that’s the exception. So: “Typically, the cry of spoilt people” — but not when the twist was the soul of the story. Then, it’s not just spoilt… it’s tragic.