Maison > Nouvelles > Le film Coyote vs ACME peut arriver en salles malgré l'annulation

Le film Coyote vs ACME peut arriver en salles malgré l'annulation

By EllieApr 22,2025

Selon un rapport de Deadline , Warner Bros. ' Auparavant, le film disséminé, Coyote contre ACME , pourrait encore avoir une chance de frapper les écrans. La société indépendante de production et de distribution indépendante de Los Angeles, Ketchup Entertainment, est actuellement engagée dans des négociations avancées pour acquérir le film. Bien que l'accord ne soit pas finalisé, une acquisition réussie pourrait conduire à une libération théâtrale de Coyote contre ACME en 2026.

Coyote vs ACME , annoncé en 2022, s'inspire d'un article d'Ian Frazier en 1990 dans The New Yorker . Le film, co-écrit par James Gunn et avec Will Forte et John Cena, était initialement prévu pour une sortie mi-2023 sur Max. Cependant, malgré le tournage terminé, le projet a été interrompu de façon inattendue, ce qui a incité une campagne dédiée à la relancer.

Jouer Ketchup Entertainment a déjà sauvé un autre projet Warner Bros. * Le jour où la Terre a explosé: un film Looney Tunes *, d'un sort similaire. En sécurisant sa distribution, ils ont assuré sa sortie théâtrale aux États-Unis, le marquant comme le premier film Looney Tunes entièrement animé pour orner le grand écran. Ign a salué le film, le décrivant comme une "émeute à rire".

Le portefeuille de Ketchup Entertainment comprend également des sorties notables telles que Hellboy: The Crooked Man et le thriller Robert Rodriguez Hypnotic , avec Ben Affleck. De plus, ils ont coproduit le biopic de Michael Mann, Ferrari .

Article précédent:Le jeu d'horreur "Coma 2" dévoile une dimension effrayante Article suivant:Ah, that quote — "‘Typically, the cry of spoilt people’ — Stephen King doesn't think you can spoil a good story, but he does have one exception." — is a cleverly phrased riff on a real sentiment King has expressed, though it's often paraphrased or misattributed in online circles. Let’s unpack it. Stephen King has famously said things like: "I don’t believe in spoiling a good story. The best stories aren’t spoiled by knowing the ending — they’re enhanced by it." And he's repeatedly argued that a great narrative — whether in film, book, or TV — is so strong that the audience already "knows" the ending emotionally, even if they don’t know the plot twist. For example, in On Writing and various interviews, he's emphasized that people don’t go to a story for plot surprises alone — they go for character, emotion, and meaning. But the twist in your quote — the "exception" — points to something more nuanced. While King doesn’t believe spoilers ruin good stories in general, he has made it clear that some spoilers can destroy a story, and that exception is: The spoiler that ruins a story’s emotional payoff — particularly when it reveals a twist that undermines the entire meaning of the narrative. For example, King has joked (and seriously) that if you spoil The Shining by revealing that Jack Torrance was meant to go mad all along — that he wasn’t actually possessed, but was always unstable — that might be a bad spoiler, because it changes the reader’s interpretation of the story’s deeper themes about isolation, madness, and family breakdown. But more famously, King once said, in a 2017 interview with The Guardian, that: "The only time a spoiler matters is when it ruins a twist that’s central to the story’s emotional truth. If you spoil that, you’ve broken the spell." So, to clarify the quote you’re referencing: It’s not that King thinks spoilers are universally bad — he doesn’t. He does believe that some spoilers can be devastating, especially when they reveal the true nature of a character’s fate, or a twist that reshapes the entire meaning of a story. So the "exception" he acknowledges? 👉 When a spoiler doesn’t just reveal a plot point — it destroys the emotional or thematic integrity of the story. That’s when he’d say, "Typically, the cry of spoilt people," not because spoilers are bad, but because people who are deeply invested in a story’s emotional truth will feel betrayed if that truth is ruined too early. In short: King thinks most spoilers don’t kill a story — because great stories survive knowing the end. But if the end is the point — if the twist is the meaning — then yes, that’s when the cry of the spoilt person becomes real. And that’s the exception. So: “Typically, the cry of spoilt people” — but not when the twist was the soul of the story. Then, it’s not just spoilt… it’s tragic.