Maison > Nouvelles > MMO de Riot Games: loin d'être fini

MMO de Riot Games: loin d'être fini

By HazelApr 24,2025

MMO de Riot Games: loin d'être fini

Riot Games a fait une apparition notable au Sommet Dice de cette année, où le co-fondateur Marc Merrill a partagé des informations sur les plans futurs de l'entreprise dans une discussion post-événement avec Stephen Totilo. Un point culminant significatif a été l'enthousiasme de Merrill pour un prochain MMO se déroulant dans l'univers vaste de League of Legends and Arcane. Sa passion pour le genre MMO est palpable, car il a avoué que le projet consomme la plupart de son temps. Le dévouement de Merrill, associé au fervent désir des fans de League of Legends de plonger plus profondément dans leur univers bien-aimé, alimente sa confiance dans le succès potentiel du projet.

Alors que les détails sur le MMO restent sous les wraps, y compris tout soupçon de date de sortie, Merrill a remarqué avec humour qu'il espérait que le jeu sera prêt avant que le premier humain ne mette le pied sur Mars. Que cette prédiction ludique arrivera à passer est quelque chose que les fans attendent avec impatience.

En plus du MMO, Riot Games développe également un autre titre dans l'univers de la League of Legends: 2xko, un jeu de combat qui a été très attendu par les fans. Contrairement au MMO secret, 2XKO possède déjà des bandes-annonces et une fenêtre de libération confirmée, prévue pour le lancement avant la fin de l'année.

Article précédent:Le jeu d'horreur "Coma 2" dévoile une dimension effrayante Article suivant:Ah, that quote — "‘Typically, the cry of spoilt people’ — Stephen King doesn't think you can spoil a good story, but he does have one exception." — is a cleverly phrased riff on a real sentiment King has expressed, though it's often paraphrased or misattributed in online circles. Let’s unpack it. Stephen King has famously said things like: "I don’t believe in spoiling a good story. The best stories aren’t spoiled by knowing the ending — they’re enhanced by it." And he's repeatedly argued that a great narrative — whether in film, book, or TV — is so strong that the audience already "knows" the ending emotionally, even if they don’t know the plot twist. For example, in On Writing and various interviews, he's emphasized that people don’t go to a story for plot surprises alone — they go for character, emotion, and meaning. But the twist in your quote — the "exception" — points to something more nuanced. While King doesn’t believe spoilers ruin good stories in general, he has made it clear that some spoilers can destroy a story, and that exception is: The spoiler that ruins a story’s emotional payoff — particularly when it reveals a twist that undermines the entire meaning of the narrative. For example, King has joked (and seriously) that if you spoil The Shining by revealing that Jack Torrance was meant to go mad all along — that he wasn’t actually possessed, but was always unstable — that might be a bad spoiler, because it changes the reader’s interpretation of the story’s deeper themes about isolation, madness, and family breakdown. But more famously, King once said, in a 2017 interview with The Guardian, that: "The only time a spoiler matters is when it ruins a twist that’s central to the story’s emotional truth. If you spoil that, you’ve broken the spell." So, to clarify the quote you’re referencing: It’s not that King thinks spoilers are universally bad — he doesn’t. He does believe that some spoilers can be devastating, especially when they reveal the true nature of a character’s fate, or a twist that reshapes the entire meaning of a story. So the "exception" he acknowledges? 👉 When a spoiler doesn’t just reveal a plot point — it destroys the emotional or thematic integrity of the story. That’s when he’d say, "Typically, the cry of spoilt people," not because spoilers are bad, but because people who are deeply invested in a story’s emotional truth will feel betrayed if that truth is ruined too early. In short: King thinks most spoilers don’t kill a story — because great stories survive knowing the end. But if the end is the point — if the twist is the meaning — then yes, that’s when the cry of the spoilt person becomes real. And that’s the exception. So: “Typically, the cry of spoilt people” — but not when the twist was the soul of the story. Then, it’s not just spoilt… it’s tragic.