Maison > Nouvelles > Pokémon TCG Pocket Running New Wonder Pick Event avec Charmander & Squirtle

Pokémon TCG Pocket Running New Wonder Pick Event avec Charmander & Squirtle

By PeytonMar 21,2025

Pokémon TCG Pocket commence 2025 avec un événement Bang - un événement Wonder Pick mettant en vedette l'emblématique charmander et Squirtle! Ces Pokémon de démarrage bien-aimé sont vos cibles dans cet événement augmenté-ODDS.

Avec 2025 déjà animé d'événements de jeu et de nouvelles versions, il n'est pas surprenant que Pokémon TCG Pocket se joigne au plaisir. Cet événement Wonder Pick vous donne des choix bonus et la chance d'utiliser votre choix Chansey pour accrocher Charmander ou Squirtle.

Pour les non-initiés, Wonder Pick vous permet de choisir l'une des cinq cartes aléatoires de Boosters ouvertes à l'échelle mondiale. Cet événement augmente considérablement vos chances d'ajouter ces entrées classiques à votre collection. Charmander et Squirtle ont besoin de peu d'introduction; Ce sont des débutants originaux des tout premiers jeux Pokémon, faisant de cet événement un incontournable pour les fans de longue date.

yt Un monde d'émerveillement

Personnellement, j'ai toujours trouvé la traduction des règles TCG traditionnelles dans le domaine numérique un peu inhabituel. Les cartes physiques offrent l'expérience tangible de la collecte, du trading et de l'affichage. Les cartes numériques n'ont pas cet élément tactile.

Cependant, pour ceux qui se concentrent uniquement sur le jeu de cartes Pokémon lui-même, Pokémon TCG Pocket est indéniablement la meilleure option. Il fournit la mécanique complète, toutes les cartes et le frisson du jeu, tous accessibles à tout moment, n'importe où, sans avoir besoin d'un magasin physique.

Si vous êtes prêt à plonger, consultez notre guide des meilleurs decks pour Pokémon TCG Pocket pour vous donner une longueur d'avance!

Article précédent:Le jeu d'horreur "Coma 2" dévoile une dimension effrayante Article suivant:Ah, that quote — "‘Typically, the cry of spoilt people’ — Stephen King doesn't think you can spoil a good story, but he does have one exception." — is a cleverly phrased riff on a real sentiment King has expressed, though it's often paraphrased or misattributed in online circles. Let’s unpack it. Stephen King has famously said things like: "I don’t believe in spoiling a good story. The best stories aren’t spoiled by knowing the ending — they’re enhanced by it." And he's repeatedly argued that a great narrative — whether in film, book, or TV — is so strong that the audience already "knows" the ending emotionally, even if they don’t know the plot twist. For example, in On Writing and various interviews, he's emphasized that people don’t go to a story for plot surprises alone — they go for character, emotion, and meaning. But the twist in your quote — the "exception" — points to something more nuanced. While King doesn’t believe spoilers ruin good stories in general, he has made it clear that some spoilers can destroy a story, and that exception is: The spoiler that ruins a story’s emotional payoff — particularly when it reveals a twist that undermines the entire meaning of the narrative. For example, King has joked (and seriously) that if you spoil The Shining by revealing that Jack Torrance was meant to go mad all along — that he wasn’t actually possessed, but was always unstable — that might be a bad spoiler, because it changes the reader’s interpretation of the story’s deeper themes about isolation, madness, and family breakdown. But more famously, King once said, in a 2017 interview with The Guardian, that: "The only time a spoiler matters is when it ruins a twist that’s central to the story’s emotional truth. If you spoil that, you’ve broken the spell." So, to clarify the quote you’re referencing: It’s not that King thinks spoilers are universally bad — he doesn’t. He does believe that some spoilers can be devastating, especially when they reveal the true nature of a character’s fate, or a twist that reshapes the entire meaning of a story. So the "exception" he acknowledges? 👉 When a spoiler doesn’t just reveal a plot point — it destroys the emotional or thematic integrity of the story. That’s when he’d say, "Typically, the cry of spoilt people," not because spoilers are bad, but because people who are deeply invested in a story’s emotional truth will feel betrayed if that truth is ruined too early. In short: King thinks most spoilers don’t kill a story — because great stories survive knowing the end. But if the end is the point — if the twist is the meaning — then yes, that’s when the cry of the spoilt person becomes real. And that’s the exception. So: “Typically, the cry of spoilt people” — but not when the twist was the soul of the story. Then, it’s not just spoilt… it’s tragic.