Maison > Nouvelles > Le film d'animation Witcher de Netflix arrive en février

Le film d'animation Witcher de Netflix arrive en février

By MadisonMar 21,2025

Netflix publie un nouveau film d'animation de sorcers, arrivant le 11 février 2025! Préparez-vous pour * The Witcher: Sirens of the Deep *.

Le plus récent spin-offide animé de Witcher

Une confrontation du village balnéaire

Le film d'animation Witcher de Netflix arrive en février

Basé sur la nouvelle d'Andrzej Sapkowski, "A Little Sacrifice", de * Sword of Destiny *, * The Witcher: Sirens of the Deep * plonge les téléspectateurs dans un village côtier où un conflit vieux de siècles entre les humains et Merfolk éclate. Cette fois, Geralt échange des monstres typiques pour une confrontation avec les créatures de The Deep.

Les acteurs de la voix de retour incluent Doug Cockle comme Geralt, Joey Batey dans le rôle de Jaskier et Anya Chalotra comme Yennefer. Christina Wren (Will Trent) rejoint le casting en tant que nouveau personnage, Essi Daven.

Andrzej Sapkowski agit en tant que consultant créatif, avec Mike Ostrowski et Rae Benjamin (écrivains de la série en direct) pour écrire le scénario. Kang Hei Chul, artiste de storyboard pour * The Witcher: Nightmare of the Wolf *, dirige.

Un intermède de la saison 1

Le film d'animation Witcher de Netflix arrive en février

Le film se met de manière transparente dans la chronologie de la série en direct, s'adaptant entre les épisodes 5 et 6 de la saison 1. Après la rencontre de Geralt et Yennefer à Rinde après avoir libéré un Djinn, Geralt est embauché pour faire face à une menace monstrueuse près de la côte. Alors que le décor de l'histoire suggère un emplacement près de Redania et Temeria, la courte histoire originale place les événements de la ville de Bremevroord à Temeria, gouvernés par Duke Agloval. Il reste à voir si le film adhère strictement à cet endroit.

Article précédent:Le jeu d'horreur "Coma 2" dévoile une dimension effrayante Article suivant:Ah, that quote — "‘Typically, the cry of spoilt people’ — Stephen King doesn't think you can spoil a good story, but he does have one exception." — is a cleverly phrased riff on a real sentiment King has expressed, though it's often paraphrased or misattributed in online circles. Let’s unpack it. Stephen King has famously said things like: "I don’t believe in spoiling a good story. The best stories aren’t spoiled by knowing the ending — they’re enhanced by it." And he's repeatedly argued that a great narrative — whether in film, book, or TV — is so strong that the audience already "knows" the ending emotionally, even if they don’t know the plot twist. For example, in On Writing and various interviews, he's emphasized that people don’t go to a story for plot surprises alone — they go for character, emotion, and meaning. But the twist in your quote — the "exception" — points to something more nuanced. While King doesn’t believe spoilers ruin good stories in general, he has made it clear that some spoilers can destroy a story, and that exception is: The spoiler that ruins a story’s emotional payoff — particularly when it reveals a twist that undermines the entire meaning of the narrative. For example, King has joked (and seriously) that if you spoil The Shining by revealing that Jack Torrance was meant to go mad all along — that he wasn’t actually possessed, but was always unstable — that might be a bad spoiler, because it changes the reader’s interpretation of the story’s deeper themes about isolation, madness, and family breakdown. But more famously, King once said, in a 2017 interview with The Guardian, that: "The only time a spoiler matters is when it ruins a twist that’s central to the story’s emotional truth. If you spoil that, you’ve broken the spell." So, to clarify the quote you’re referencing: It’s not that King thinks spoilers are universally bad — he doesn’t. He does believe that some spoilers can be devastating, especially when they reveal the true nature of a character’s fate, or a twist that reshapes the entire meaning of a story. So the "exception" he acknowledges? 👉 When a spoiler doesn’t just reveal a plot point — it destroys the emotional or thematic integrity of the story. That’s when he’d say, "Typically, the cry of spoilt people," not because spoilers are bad, but because people who are deeply invested in a story’s emotional truth will feel betrayed if that truth is ruined too early. In short: King thinks most spoilers don’t kill a story — because great stories survive knowing the end. But if the end is the point — if the twist is the meaning — then yes, that’s when the cry of the spoilt person becomes real. And that’s the exception. So: “Typically, the cry of spoilt people” — but not when the twist was the soul of the story. Then, it’s not just spoilt… it’s tragic.