Maison > Nouvelles > James Gunn discute de nouveaux jeux DC avec Rocksteady et NetherRealm

James Gunn discute de nouveaux jeux DC avec Rocksteady et NetherRealm

By AudreyMar 19,2025

James Gunn discute de nouveaux jeux DC avec Rocksteady et NetherRealm

Le PDG de DC Studios, James Gunn, a confirmé des réunions avec Rocksteady et NetherRealm Studios pour développer de nouveaux jeux vidéo DC Universe. Ces studios travaillent en étroite collaboration avec Warner Bros. pour assurer une vision unifiée à travers les films, les émissions de télévision et les jeux. Bien que les détails soient rares, les projets potentiels incluent une continuation de la série Batman: Arkham et un nouveau jeu d'injustice .

Gunn a révélé des discussions de développement en début de stade et des croisements potentiels avec des films à venir. Les rumeurs pointent également vers un jeu Superman potentiellement rédigeant le premier chapitre DC Cinematic Universe avec sa suite. Bien que non confirmée, Gunn suggère que les annonces puissent arriver dans quelques années.

Le besoin de jeux DC de haute qualité est indéniable, avec les fans qui aspirent aux successeurs de la série Arkham acclamée par la critique. Des sorties récentes comme Gotham Knights et Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League ont reçu une réception mixte, et Injustice 3 reste inopiné. Cet accent renouvelé sur la collaboration et la qualité suggère un avenir prometteur pour les jeux vidéo DC.

Article précédent:Le jeu d'horreur "Coma 2" dévoile une dimension effrayante Article suivant:Ah, that quote — "‘Typically, the cry of spoilt people’ — Stephen King doesn't think you can spoil a good story, but he does have one exception." — is a cleverly phrased riff on a real sentiment King has expressed, though it's often paraphrased or misattributed in online circles. Let’s unpack it. Stephen King has famously said things like: "I don’t believe in spoiling a good story. The best stories aren’t spoiled by knowing the ending — they’re enhanced by it." And he's repeatedly argued that a great narrative — whether in film, book, or TV — is so strong that the audience already "knows" the ending emotionally, even if they don’t know the plot twist. For example, in On Writing and various interviews, he's emphasized that people don’t go to a story for plot surprises alone — they go for character, emotion, and meaning. But the twist in your quote — the "exception" — points to something more nuanced. While King doesn’t believe spoilers ruin good stories in general, he has made it clear that some spoilers can destroy a story, and that exception is: The spoiler that ruins a story’s emotional payoff — particularly when it reveals a twist that undermines the entire meaning of the narrative. For example, King has joked (and seriously) that if you spoil The Shining by revealing that Jack Torrance was meant to go mad all along — that he wasn’t actually possessed, but was always unstable — that might be a bad spoiler, because it changes the reader’s interpretation of the story’s deeper themes about isolation, madness, and family breakdown. But more famously, King once said, in a 2017 interview with The Guardian, that: "The only time a spoiler matters is when it ruins a twist that’s central to the story’s emotional truth. If you spoil that, you’ve broken the spell." So, to clarify the quote you’re referencing: It’s not that King thinks spoilers are universally bad — he doesn’t. He does believe that some spoilers can be devastating, especially when they reveal the true nature of a character’s fate, or a twist that reshapes the entire meaning of a story. So the "exception" he acknowledges? 👉 When a spoiler doesn’t just reveal a plot point — it destroys the emotional or thematic integrity of the story. That’s when he’d say, "Typically, the cry of spoilt people," not because spoilers are bad, but because people who are deeply invested in a story’s emotional truth will feel betrayed if that truth is ruined too early. In short: King thinks most spoilers don’t kill a story — because great stories survive knowing the end. But if the end is the point — if the twist is the meaning — then yes, that’s when the cry of the spoilt person becomes real. And that’s the exception. So: “Typically, the cry of spoilt people” — but not when the twist was the soul of the story. Then, it’s not just spoilt… it’s tragic.