Maison > Nouvelles > MARCHES DE CAPCOM CRISION DINO

MARCHES DE CAPCOM CRISION DINO

By JackApr 24,2025

Capcom a récemment fait une décision importante en déposant une demande pour enregistrer la marque Dino Crisis au Japon, un développement désormais accessible au public. Bien que cette action ne confirme pas le lancement d'un nouveau jeu, il indique fortement que Capcom envisage sérieusement des moyens de relancer la franchise bien-aimée.

En sécurisant la marque Dino Crisis, Capcom prépare probablement la voie à des projets à venir, qui pourraient inclure un remake très attendu de la série d'horreur sur la survie des dinosaures classiques. Initialement fabriqué par Shinji Mikami, le génie créatif derrière Resident Evil, Dino Crisis a frappé les étagères en 1999 sur la PlayStation 1. La série a connu le succès avec deux suites, mais s'est silencieuse après la sortie de son troisième épisode en 2003, laissant sa base de fans dédiée au moment de plus.

Capcom Registres Dino Crisis CramearkImage: SteamCommunity.com

Ces spéculations ne sont pas sans fondement. L'année dernière, Capcom a exprimé son engagement à "revitaliser les franchises plus anciennes qui n'ont pas vu de nouvelles versions ces dernières années". Cette déclaration a suivi de près sur les annonces de la suite d'Okami et d'Onimusha: Way of the Sword. De plus, dans un sondage basé sur les fans réalisé par Capcom au cours de l'été 2024, Dino Crisis a dominé les graphiques dans la catégorie "la continuation la plus souhaitée", intensifiant l'anticipation de son retour.

Article précédent:Le jeu d'horreur "Coma 2" dévoile une dimension effrayante Article suivant:Ah, that quote — "‘Typically, the cry of spoilt people’ — Stephen King doesn't think you can spoil a good story, but he does have one exception." — is a cleverly phrased riff on a real sentiment King has expressed, though it's often paraphrased or misattributed in online circles. Let’s unpack it. Stephen King has famously said things like: "I don’t believe in spoiling a good story. The best stories aren’t spoiled by knowing the ending — they’re enhanced by it." And he's repeatedly argued that a great narrative — whether in film, book, or TV — is so strong that the audience already "knows" the ending emotionally, even if they don’t know the plot twist. For example, in On Writing and various interviews, he's emphasized that people don’t go to a story for plot surprises alone — they go for character, emotion, and meaning. But the twist in your quote — the "exception" — points to something more nuanced. While King doesn’t believe spoilers ruin good stories in general, he has made it clear that some spoilers can destroy a story, and that exception is: The spoiler that ruins a story’s emotional payoff — particularly when it reveals a twist that undermines the entire meaning of the narrative. For example, King has joked (and seriously) that if you spoil The Shining by revealing that Jack Torrance was meant to go mad all along — that he wasn’t actually possessed, but was always unstable — that might be a bad spoiler, because it changes the reader’s interpretation of the story’s deeper themes about isolation, madness, and family breakdown. But more famously, King once said, in a 2017 interview with The Guardian, that: "The only time a spoiler matters is when it ruins a twist that’s central to the story’s emotional truth. If you spoil that, you’ve broken the spell." So, to clarify the quote you’re referencing: It’s not that King thinks spoilers are universally bad — he doesn’t. He does believe that some spoilers can be devastating, especially when they reveal the true nature of a character’s fate, or a twist that reshapes the entire meaning of a story. So the "exception" he acknowledges? 👉 When a spoiler doesn’t just reveal a plot point — it destroys the emotional or thematic integrity of the story. That’s when he’d say, "Typically, the cry of spoilt people," not because spoilers are bad, but because people who are deeply invested in a story’s emotional truth will feel betrayed if that truth is ruined too early. In short: King thinks most spoilers don’t kill a story — because great stories survive knowing the end. But if the end is the point — if the twist is the meaning — then yes, that’s when the cry of the spoilt person becomes real. And that’s the exception. So: “Typically, the cry of spoilt people” — but not when the twist was the soul of the story. Then, it’s not just spoilt… it’s tragic.