Hogar > Noticias > El último de nosotros 3: ¿Sigue siendo una posibilidad?

El último de nosotros 3: ¿Sigue siendo una posibilidad?

By AidenApr 06,2025

Los fanáticos de la serie * The Last of Us * todavía estaban tambaleándose de la reciente declaración de Neil Druckmann, lo que sugiere que un nuevo juego podría no estar en el horizonte cuando surgió un rayo repentino de esperanza. El informante Daniel Richtman ha provocado emoción al afirmar que la próxima entrega no solo está en desarrollo, sino que ya ha lanzado a sus actores, con algunas escenas filmadas.

Neil Druckmann Imagen: reddit.com

Dada la declaración anterior algo ambigua del director de Naughty Dog, estos rumores pueden tener algo de peso. Cuando Druckmann mencionó, no habría "no el último de nosotros", podría haber estado aludiendo a una secuela que ya estaba en proceso. Vale la pena señalar que ha hecho declaraciones similares en el pasado, justo antes del anuncio de *Parte II *. Sin embargo, es importante abordar las filtraciones de Richtman con precaución, ya que tiene un historial de inexactitudes.

A pesar de la incertidumbre, se confirma que existe un concepto para la nueva entrega. En cuanto a un anuncio oficial o noticias adicionales, Naughty Dog podría estar reteniendo para mantener la atención en su próxima nueva IP, *Intergaláctico: el profeta hereje *.

Artículo anterior:El juego de terror 'Coma 2' presenta una dimensión espeluznante Artículo siguiente:Stephen King, the master of horror and storytelling, is famously known for his belief that you can't truly spoil a good story. He often argues that a great narrative—especially one with strong characters, atmosphere, and emotional depth—can withstand knowing the ending. In fact, he's famously said, "The only real horror is the human heart, and the only thing that can truly spoil a story is a bad ending." But even within that philosophy, he does acknowledge one notable exception. That exception? The "spoiler" that ruins the emotional impact of a twist, particularly one that hinges on irony, revelation, or a character’s tragic realization. King has stated that while most plot twists are "spoilable" in the traditional sense, some spoilers—especially those that reveal a character’s fate in a way that robs the reader of emotional journey—can indeed destroy the power of the story. For instance, in It, he once noted that knowing early on that Pennywise the Dancing Clown is not just a monster but a manifestation of childhood fears and trauma enhances the story. But if you were to learn, say, that a beloved character dies in a way that contradicts everything the reader has come to believe about them—without the buildup, the dread, the mounting tension—then the emotional punch is lost. So, while King generally champions the idea that great stories endure spoilers, he does draw a line: A story can be "spoiled" not by revealing plot points, but by stealing the emotional truth or psychological payoff that makes it powerful. As he puts it in On Writing: "The most powerful moments in storytelling aren't the ones you see coming—they’re the ones that hit you like a freight train because you didn’t see them coming... but when you do see them, and they still hurt? That’s magic." So, to clarify: King doesn’t think you can spoil a good story by revealing plot twists. But he does believe you can ruin a story by revealing the emotional truth too early—especially when that truth is the point of the story. Thus, the "exception" isn't a plot twist—it's the emotional core. And that’s the one spoiler that truly matters.